Affidavits, Reports, Witness Statements,Photographs, ... and Transcripts
Asbury, Anne. Affidavit filed in United States v. John Philip Walker
Lindh, U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Criminal No.
02-347A. Styled, “In Support of Criminal Complaint and Arrest Warrant.”
Verification of facts regarding suspect’s admissions and waiver of
Ashcroft, John. Transcript of press conference given by United States
Attorney General John Ashcroft on January 15, 2002, regarding criminal
charges against John Walker Lindh based on voluntary statements made to
90th Cong., 1st sess., 1967. Vol. 1120. Controlling Crime through More
Effective Law Enforcement: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Criminal
Laws and Procedure of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
Cooley, Carroll F., with Joseph R. Farmer. The Inside Story of
Miranda - Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board. 1980.
Frank, John P. Review of The New Legality - 1932--1968 (U.S. Supreme
Court Decisions). 58 American Bar Association Journal 394
- - - . “Miranda Today, Appleton, Wisconsin.” Lawrence University
convocation address, November 5, 1985.
Police Departmental Reports 62-40126, November 1962; 63-07180, February
1963; 63-08380, March 1963; 74-07204, July 1974; and 76-011123, January
Smith, Darrell F. “Seminar On Miranda.” Seminar materials prepared by
Smith, attorney general of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, August 12, 1996.
Subcommittee on Criminal Justice Oversight of the Committee on the
Judiciary of the United States Senate. Statement of Professor Paul G.
Cassell. 86-page statement concerning the enforcement of 18 U.S.C.
3501 as of May 13, 1999.
Senate Judiciary Committee. The Clinton Justice Department’s Refusal
to Enforce the Law on Voluntary Confessions under 18 U.S.C. 3501.
106th Cong., 1st sess., Senate Hearing 106237, May 13, 1999.
Personal Records, Correspondence, and Notes
Miranda, Ernest A. Materials referenced: signed “Miranda Rights Card”
dated 6-13-66; Phoenix booking photos, 1960 and 1963; prison records;
FBI Record No. 879313C regarding arrests and convictions between October
29, 1957, and July 16, 1974; handwritten confession signed by Ernest
Miranda on March 13, 1963.
Personal Correspondence and Notes provided by: Justice Robert Corcoran,
John P. Frank, Carroll F. Cooley, Peter D. Baird, Judge Barry Silverman,
and Gary Nelson.
Court Filings and Records
Brennan, William, Justice. Signed memorandum to the chief justice
regarding the Miranda opinion, May 11, 1966.
Judgment of Guilt and Sentence, Nos. 41497 and 41498, signed by the Hon.
Maricopa County Superior Criminal Information, Nos. 41947 and 41948,
filed April 16, 1963.
Northeast Phoenix Justice Court, No. 7345, criminal complaint, filed
March 14, 1963.
Notice of Intent to Prove Insanity or Mental Defectiveness, filed by
Alvin Moore, May 11, 1963.
Pleadings and transcripts filed in Maricopa County Superior Court,
Docket No. 41498, February 15--17, 20--23, 1967, before the Hon.
Laurence T. Wren.
Pleadings and transcripts filed in Maricopa County Superior Court,
Docket No. 41497, 1969, before the Hon. William H. Gooding and the Hon.
Philip W. Marquardt.
Pleadings and transcripts filed in the United States District Court for
the District of Arizona, No. Civ 69-10, before the Hon. C. A. Muecke.
Pleadings, briefs, and opinions filed in the Arizona Supreme Court,
Docket Nos. 1394, 1397, 1397-1, 1397-2, 1802.
Pleadings, briefs, and opinions filed in the United States Supreme
Court, Docket No. 759, October Term, 1965, Ernesto A. Miranda,
Petitioner; and Docket No. 2176, October Term, 1968, Ernesto A. Miranda,
Pleadings, briefs, and opinions filed in the United States Supreme
Court, Docket No. 99, October Term, 2000, Dickerson v. United States
Pleadings, briefs, and opinions filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 99-5525.
Psychiatric Report of James M. Kilgore Jr., M.D., May 28, 1963.
Psychiatric Report of Leo Rubinow, M.D., June 4, 1963.
Reporter’s transcript of trial in Maricopa County Superior Court Docket
Nos. 41497 and 41498, June 19 and 20, 1963, before the Hon. Yale McFate.
State’s Exhibit 1 in Docket No. 41498 (typed, signed confession by
Ernest Miranda, witnessed by Carroll Cooley and Wilfred M. Young).
Warren, Earl, Chief Justice. Handwritten notes prepared in advance of
releasing the Miranda opinion in May 1966.
Author Interview Notes and Correspondence Files
Alcorn, Marianne, Esq., Librarian, Arizona State University College of
Ares, Charles, Dean, University of Arizona College of Law.
Baird, Peter, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Bender, Paul, Dean, Arizona State University College of Law.
Blakey, Craig, Judge, Maricopa County Superior Court.
Brooks, Thomas, Judge, Coconino County Superior Court.
Cooley, Carroll, Captain, Phoenix Police Department.
Corcoran, Robert, Justice, Arizona Supreme Court.
Dowd, John, Esq., Washington, D.C.
Fish, Paul, Esq., Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Frank, John P., Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Futterman, Craig, Esq., Chicago, Illinois.
Howe, Joseph, Judge, Maricopa County Superior Court.
Jensen, Robert, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Johns, Christopher, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Kimerer, Michael, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Kroll, Barry, Esq., Chicago, Illinois.
Kyl, Jon. U.S. Senator, R-Arizona.
Lee, Rex, Esq. Former solicitor general of the United States, president
of Brigham Young University, deceased.
Martone, Fred. Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
and former justice of the Arizona Supreme Court.
Mauet, Tom. Professor, University of Arizona College of Law.
Mehrens, Craig, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Moeller, John. Justice, Arizona Supreme Court.
Napolitano, Janet, Esq. Governor, State of Arizona, former Arizona
Nelson, Gary. Arizona attorney general and judge of the Arizona Court of
Quaife, Ron. Detective, Phoenix Police Department.
Roush, Charles, Esq. Former judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court.
Schroeder, Mary. Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Siegel, Mara, Esq. Phoenix, Arizona.
Silverman, Barry, Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Storrs, Robert, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Thinnes, Thomas, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Turngate, Susan, Esq., Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Turoff, Larry, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Ulrich, Paul, Esq., Phoenix, Arizona.
Wolfson, Warren, Judge. Illinois Court of Appeals.
Audio, Video, and Multimedia Materials
Cassell, Paul. Overhaul Miranda? http://www.law.utah.edu/Cassell.
Focus on the Fifth: Miranda v. Arizona.
FindLaw Constitutional Law Center, http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com.
Gideon v. Wainwright and Miranda vs. Arizona.
Narrated by Ramsey Clark, Guidance Associates, Mt. Kisco, NY, 1986.
Grant, Michael, Moderator. Miranda v. Arizona. Panelists: Dean
Paul Bender, Attorney General Gary Nelson, Assistant Attorney General
Steve Twist, and Judge Rudolph Gerber, KAET, Channel 8, Arizona State
Gribben, Mark. All about Miranda v. Arizona - The Crime That Changed
American Justice. http://www/crimelibrary.com.
Guidelines for Interrogations: Waiver of Rights under Miranda, Obtaining
and Proving Waiver of Rights as an Element of Durable Convictions.
Narrated by Daliel J. Penofsky, Aqueduct Books, Rochester, NY, 1967.
Irons, Peter, and Stephanie Guitton, Eds. May It Please the
Court - Historic Recordings of 23 Leading Supreme Court Cases.
Published in conjunction with the Earl Warren Bill of Rights Project of
the University of California, San Diego and the Northwest Public Affairs
Warren, Earl, Chief Justice, and Justice William Brennan. Miranda
Baker, Liva. Miranda: Crime, Law and Politics. NY: Antheneum
Brandt, Charles. The Right to Remain Silent. NY: St. Martin’s
Cohen, Stanley. Law Enforcement Guide to United States Supreme Court
Decisions. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing, 1971.
Cray, Ed. The Big Blue Line: Police Power vs. Human Rights. NY:
Coward-McCann Inc., 1967.
Dash, Samuel. Foreword to From Escobedo to Miranda: The Anatomy of a
Supreme Court Decision, by Richard J. Medalie. Washington, D.C.:
Lerner Law Book Company, 1996.
,T., .7th. NY: ,
Frank, John P. Mr. Justice Black: The Man and His Opinions. NY:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1949.
- - - . Cases on Constitutional Law. Chicago: Callaghan & Co.,
- - - . Cases on Constitutional Law. 2nd ed. Chicago:
Callaghan & Co., 1950.
- - - . Cases on the Constitution. NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.,
- - - . The Marble Palace: The Supreme Court in American Life.
NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 1958.
- - - . American Law: The Case of Radical Reform - Lectures upon
the Dedication of the Earl Warren Legal Center. NY: MacMillan
- - - . Justice Daniel, Dissenting. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1964.
- - - . The Warren Court: A Personality and Photographic Portrait
of the Justices on Today’s United States Supreme Court. NY:
MacMillan Co., 1964.
- - - . Clement Haynsworth: The Senate and the Supreme Court.
Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1991.
George, James B., Jr., Stephen Glasser, and Yale Kamisar. A New Look
at Confessions: Escobedo - The Second Round. Ann Arbor: Institute of
Continuing Legal Education, Hutchins Hall, 1967.
Grano, Joseph D. Confessions, Truth, and the Law. Ann Arbor: The
University of Michigan Press, 1993.
Huff, Ronald C., Rattner Arye, and Edward Sagarin. Convicted but
Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy. Beverly Hills: Sage
Kamisar, Yale. Police Interrogation and Confessions. Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press, 1980.
Leo, Richard A., and George C. Thomas III., Eds. The Miranda Debate:
Law, Justice, and Policing. Boston: Northeastern University Press,
Levy, Leonard. Origins of the Fifth Amendment: The Right against
Self-Incrimination. NY: MacMillan Co., 1986.
Lewis, Anthony. Gideon’s Trumpet. NY: Random House, 1964.
Medalie, Richard J. From Escobedo to Miranda: The Anatomy of a
Supreme Court Decision. Washington, D.C.: Lerner Law Book Company,
Mersky, Roy, and Jenni Parrish. The Supreme Court in Current
Literature Overview 1964—74. Supreme Court Historical Society,
Milner, Neal A. The Court and Local Law Enforcement: The Impact of
Miranda. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1971.
- - - . Some Common Themes in Police Responses to Legal Change in
Police in Urban Society. Harlan Hahn, ed. Beverly Hills: Sage
Schafer, William J., III. Confessions and Statements.
Springfield, IL. Charles C. Thomas Publishing, 1968.
Scheck, Barry, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer. Actual Innocence: Five
Days to Execution, and Other Dispatches from the Wrongly Convicted.
NY: Doubleday, 2000.
Simon, James F. The Center Holds: The Power Struggle inside the
Rehnquist Court. NY: Simon & Schuster, 1995.
Sobel, Nathan R. The New Confession Standards, Miranda v. Arizona: A
Legal Perspective, a Practical Perspective. NY: Criminal Law
Bulletin, Inc., Gould Publications, 1996.
Sokol, Ronald. Law Abiding Policeman: A Guide to Recent Supreme Court
Decisions. Charlottesville, NC: Michie, 1966.
Stephens, Otis H., Jr. The Supreme Court and Confessions of Guilt.
Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press, 1973.
Swindler, William F. The New Legality, 1932--1968. NY: Bobbs &
White, Welsh S. Miranda’s Waning Protections: Police Interrogation
Practices after Dickerson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,
Wigmore, John H. Evidence in Trials at Common Law. Boston: John
T. Mcnaughton Inc., 1961.
Principal Supreme Court Cases and Federal Statutes
Admissibility of Confessions 18 USC 3501 (1968)
Betts v. Brady
316 U.S. 455 (1942)
Brown v. Mississippi
297 U.S. 278 (1936)
Crooker v. California
357 U.S. 433 (1958)
Dickerson v. United States
530 U.S. 428 (2000)
Edwards v. Arizona
451 U.S. 477 (1981)
Escobedo v. Illinois
378 U.S. 478 (1964)
Fulminante v. Arizona
499 U.S. 279 (1991)
Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 355 (1962)
Harris v. New York
401 U.S. 222 (1978)
Jackson v. Denno
378 U.S. 368 (1964)
Mallory v. United States
354 U.S. 449 (1957)
Malloy v. Hogan
378 U.S. 1 (1964)
Mapp v. Ohio
367 U.S. 643 (1961)
Massiah v. United States
377 U.S. 201 (1964)
McNabb v. United States
318 U.S. 332 (1943)
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (1966)
People v. Dorado
398 P.2nd 361 (1964)
Powell v. Alabama
287 U.S. 45 (1932)
Spano v. New York
360 U.S. 315 (1959)
United States v. Dickerson
166 F.2nd 667 (2000)
USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 Act. P.L. 107--56 (2001)
Law Review Articles
Alschuler, Albert W. “A Peculiar Privilege in Historical Perspective:
The Right to Remain Silent.” 94 Michigan Law Review 2625, 1996.
Altman, David B. “Fifth Amendment - Coercion and Clarity: The Supreme
Court Approves Altered Miranda Warnings.” 80 Criminal Law and
Criminology 1086, 1990.
Bateman, Connor G. “Dickerson v. United States: Miranda Is Deemed a
Constitutional Rule, but Does It Really Matter?” 55 Arkansas Law
Review 1277, 2002.
Benner, Laurence A. “Requiem for Miranda - The Rehnquist Court’s
Voluntariness Doctrine in Historical Perspective.” 67 Washington
University Law Quarterly 59, 1998.
Blaine, Jonathan L. H. “Miranda under Fire.” 10 Seton Hall
Constitutional Law Journal 1007, summer 2000.
Brennan, Timothy. “Silencing Miranda: Exploring Potential Reform to the
Law of Confessions in the Wake of Dickerson v. United States.” 27
New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 253, 2001.
Caplan, Gerald M. Review of Miranda: Crime, Law and Politics, by
Liva Baker. 93 Yale Law Journal 1375, 1984.
Cassell, Paul G. “Miranda’s Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment” 90
Northwestern University Law Review 387, 1996.
- - - . “The Statute That Time Forgot: 18 U.S.C. 3501 and the
Overhauling of Miranda” 85 Iowa Law Review 175, 1999.
Cassell, Paul G., and Bret S. Hayman. “Police Interrogation in the
1990’s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Miranda” 43 UCLA Law
Review 839, 1996.
Cassell, Paul G., and Richard Fowles. “Handcuffing the Cops? A
Thirty-Year Perspective on Miranda’s Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement”
50  Stanford Law Review 1055, 1998.
Crawford, K. A. “Intentional Violations of Miranda: A Strategy for
Liability” 66 FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 27, 1997.
Donohue, John J., III. “Did Miranda Diminish Police Effectiveness?”
50 Stanford Law Review 1147, 1998.
Dripps, Donald A. “Is Miranda Caselaw Really Inconsistent? A Proposed
Fifth Amendment Synthesis” 17 Constitutional Commentary 19,
- - - . “Constitutional Theory for Criminal Procedure
Miranda and the Continuing Quest for Broad-But-Shallow” 43 William &
Mary Law Review 1, 2001.
Garrison, Arthur H. “Rehnquist v. Scalia - The Dickerson and Miranda
Cases: A Debate on What Makes a Decision Constitutional” 91 American
Journal of Trial Advocacy 2001.
Gerhardt, Michael. “The Rhetoric of Judicial Critique: From Judicial
Restraint to the Virtual Bill of Rights” 10 William & Mary Bill of
Rights Journal 585, 2002.
Grano, Joseph, William H. Erickson, and Philip Johnson. “Miranda
Symposium: Four Essays Critical of Miranda v Arizona” 24 American
Criminal Law Review 193, 1987.
Hancock, Catherine. “Due Process before Miranda” 70 Tulane Law Review
Harris, Allen. “Miranda v. Arizona: Is It Being Applied?” 3
Criminal Law Bulletin 135, 1967.
Huh, Richard H. “Interrogation of Criminal Defendants: Some Views on
Miranda v. Arizona” 35 Fordham Law Review 233, 1968.
Huitema, David. “Miranda: Legitimate Response to Contingent Requirements
of the Fifth Amendment” 8 Yale Law & Policy Review 261, 2000.
Inbau, Fred E. “Police Interrogation - A Practical Necessity” 52
Journal of Criminal Law - Criminology and Police Science 16, 1961.
Ingram, Roderick R. “A Clash of Fundamental Rights: Conflicts between
the Fifth and Sixth Amendments in Criminal Trials” 5 William & Mary
Bill of Rights Journal 299, 1996.
Kamisar, Yale. 1984 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: Crime and
Punishment: Miranda the Case, the Man and the Players, by Liva
Baker, 82 Michigan Law Review 1974.
- - - . “Can (Did) Congress Overrule Miranda?” 4 Cornell Law
Review 883, 2000.
- - - . “Miranda Thirty-Five Years Later: A Close Look at the
Majority and Dissenting Opinions in Dickerson” 33 Arizona State Law
Journal 387, 2001.
- - - . Foreword to “From Miranda to 3501 to Dickerson.” 99
Michigan Law Review 879, 2001.
Kauper, Paul G. “Judicial Examination of the Accused - A Remedy for the
Third Degree” 30 Michigan Law Review 1224, 1932.
Langbein, John H. “The Historical Origins of the Privilege against
Self-Incrimination at Common Law” 92 Michigan Law Review 1047,
Leiken, Lawrence S. “Police Interrogation in Colorado: The
Implementation of Miranda” 47 Denver Law Journal 1, 1970.
Luban, David. “The Warren Court and the Concept of a Right” 34
Harvard Civil Rights--Civil Liberties Law Review 7, 1999.
Macnair, Michael R. T. “The Early Development of the Privilege against
Self-Incrimination” 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 66, 1990.
Markman, Stephen J. “The Fifth Amendment and Custodial Questioning: A
Response to ‘Reconsidering Miranda’” 54 University of Chicago Law
Review 938, 1987.
- - - . “Truth in Criminal Justice: The Law of Pre-trial
Interrogation” 21 Prosecutor 23, 1987.
Mason, Christopher. “Dickerson v. United States - The Supreme Court’s
Holding in Miranda v Arizona Was a Constitutional Decision That Cannot
Be Overruled by an Act of Congress” 31 University of Baltimore Law
Forum 57, 2000.
Medalie, Richard J., et al.
“Custodial Police Interrogation in Our Nation’s Capital: The Attempt to
Implement Miranda” 66 Michigan Law Review 1347, 1968.
Morgan, Edmund M. “The Privilege against Self-Incrimination” 34
Minnesota Law Review 1, 1949.
Muller, Andrew W. “Congress’ Right to Remain Silent in Dickerson v.
United States - Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love
Miranda v. Arizona” 34 Creighton Law Review 801, 2001.
Payne, Brian K., and Victoria M. Time. “Support for Miranda among Police
Chiefs: A Qualitative Examination” 1 American Journal of Criminal
Justice 65, 2000.
Pearce, Gene A. “Constitutional Law - Criminal Law: The United States
Supreme Court Affirms the Use of “Miranda” Rights by Police to Determine
the Admissibility of Statements Made during Custodial Interrogation in
Dickerson v Untied States” 77 North Dakota Law Review 153,
Pepinsky, Harold E. “A Theory of Police Reaction to Miranda v
Arizona: Crime and Delinquency” 16 Crime and Delinquency
Prebble, Amanda L. “Manipulated by Miranda: A Critical Analysis of
Bright Lines and Voluntary Confessions under United States v.
Dickerson” 68 University of Cincinnati Law Review 555, 2000.
Robinson, Cyril D. “Police and Prosecutor Practices and Attitudes
Relating to Interrogation as Revealed by Pre- and Post-Miranda
Questionnaires: A Construct of Police Capacity to Comply” 3 Duke Law
Journal 425, 1968.
Schulhofer, Stephen J. “Reconsidering Miranda” 54 University of
Chicago Law Review 435, 1987.
- - - . “Miranda, Dickerson and the Puzzling Persistence of Fifth
Amendment Exceptionalism” 99 Michigan Law Review 941, 2001.
Seeburger, Richard H., and R. Stanton Wettick. “Miranda in Pittsburgh: A
Statistical Study” 29 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 1,
Seidman, Louis Michael. “Brown and Miranda” 80 California Law Review
Stephens, Otis H. “Police Interrogation and the Supreme Court: An
Inquiry into the Limits of Judicial Policy-making” 17 Journal of
Public Law 241, 1968.
Stephens, Otis H., Robert L. Flanders, and J. Lewis Cannon. “Law
Enforcement and the Supreme Court: Police Perceptions of the Miranda
Requirements” 39 Tennessee Law Review 407, 1972.
Ulrich, Jackie. “Criminal Procedure: The Court Distinguishes between the
Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel and the Fifth Amendment Miranda Right
against Self-Incrimination” 31 Washburn Law Journal 629, 2000.
White, Welsh S. “Defending Miranda: A Reply to Professor Caplan” 39
Vanderbilt Law Review 1, 1986.
Witt, James W. “Non-Coercive Interrogation and the Administration of
Criminal Justice - The Impact of Miranda on Police Effectuality” 64
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 320, 1973.
Zeitlin, Jonathan B. “Voluntariness with a Vengeance: Miranda and a
Modern Alternative” 14 St. Thomas Law Review 109, 2001.
Zeitz, Leonard, Richard J. Medalie, and Paul Alexander. “Anomie,
Powerless and Police Interrogation” 60 Journal of Criminal
Law - Criminology and Police Science 314, 1967.
Selected Print Media
1965: “High Court Will Review Rapist’s Case.” The Arizona Republic,
1966: “Danny Escobedo - Moving the Constitution into the Police
Station.” Time Magazine, Vol. 87, No. 17, April 29, cover story.
1966: Miranda v. Arizona, ACLU news release, No. 207, June.
1966: “Some Moderation (Miranda Not Retroactive).” The Arizona
Republic, June 23.
1967: “Homicides Increase in Chicago but Confessions Drop by 50%.”
The New York Times, by Donald Janson, July 24, p. 24.
1968: “Right of Confession.” The Phoenix Gazette, January 29.
1968: “Criminal Justice: Doubts about Miranda.” Time Magazine,
1976: “Police Search for Suspect in Miranda Death.” The Arizona
Republic, January 25, 1976.
1976: “Ernesto Miranda Is Killed; Subject of Landmark Case.” The
Arizona Republic, February 1.
1976: “Miranda Dies of Stabbing.” Mesa Tribune, February 2.
1976: “Parole Officer Says Miranda Was Adjusting.” The Arizona
Republic, February 3.
1982: “Miranda - To the High Court and Back.” The Harvard Law Record,
Vol. 75, No. 6, by John Morris, October 29.
1982: “Court’s Decision Leaves Miranda in Jail.” (Part Two) The
Harvard Law Record, by John Morris, November 5.
1990: “Miranda Memories.” ABA Litigation Magazine, Vol. 16, No. 2
(winter), by Peter D. Baird, p. 43.
1991: “The John J. Flynn Award.” The Defender - Arizona Attorneys
Criminal Justice, by Michael Kimerer, April.
1991: “Critics Must Confess, Miranda Was the Right Decision.” The
Wall Street Journal, Counterpoint, by Peter D. Baird, June 13.
1991: “The Confessions of Arturo Ernesto Miranda.” The Arizona
Attorney, by Peter D. Baird, October, p. 20.
1994: “Ten People Who Changed the Way You Live - John Flynn.”
American Heritage Magazine, December.
1996: “A Member of the Legal Team Recalls the Landmark Miranda Case.”
Phoenix Magazine, by Peter D. Baird, June, p. 38.
1996: “Police vs. Miranda: Has the Supreme Court Really Hampered Law
Enforcement?” The Wall Street Journal, by Wayne E. Green,
December 15, p. 16.
1999: “High Court Should Leave Miranda Rule.” The Arizona Republic,
Editorial, January 15.
1999: “Miranda Law Benefits Most Vulnerable, Needs to Stay.” The
Arizona Republic, by Steve Wilson, February 2.
1999: “Miranda Rights Up for Review - Should Police Have Some Leeway?”
The Arizona Republic, by Jon Kamman, December 7.
2000: “The Miranda Rule: It Works Well So Let’s Keep It.” The Arizona
Daily Star, by John P. Frank, May 7.
2001: “Judges and the GOP: The Rehnquist Court, Miranda v. Arizona and
Dickerson v. United States.” The Wall Street Journal, by Kenneth
W. Starr, May 3.
2002: “Will [John Lindh] Walker’s Statements Be Admitted against Him?”
Jurist, The Legal Education Newspaper, by Prof. Marjorie Cohn,